This Saturday marked the fourth annual Women’s March on the Palouse. On the same day the annual anti-abortion march, March for Life occupied Friendship Square in downtown Moscow.
Having two very conflicting views, it was a shock to see the
two different programs occupied Moscow early this weekend. Though the two movements are known for having different voices, they were both protesting for one same value – efforts for better quality of life.
March for Life was established in 1974, originally to protest Roe v Wade. Overtime, abortion as well as topics concerning women’s reproductive rights rose to popularity after the 2016 election and President Trump’s interest of uplifting the law.
People protesting for March for Life were avid about their cause. Both men and women gathered for the event, to voice what they believe in.
The Moscow Women’s March experienced its fourth year. Back in 2017, the Women’s march was brought to Moscow as a way for people to safely express their voice for women’s rights.
It wasn’t until a year later when the Women’s March earned its
name being the largest single day protest according to the Women’s March Network. Tension started after the inauguration of President Trump in 2017, the goal of the march was to fight for human rights and other issues regarding human rights. This year, more than others, the march’s focus had centered around women’s voting rights.
2020 makes a 100-year anniversary for women’s suffrage nationwide. Because of this anniversary, the march became even more special.
People participated in the Women’s March were passionate about their movement. 2020 marked a special commemoration of development for women’s rights.
This brings up a serious issue when choosing which event to voice an opinion at. Being on the same day meant it was impossible to march for both.
Being anti-abortion carries the stigma of being anti-feminist. Protesting Roe v Wade meant that women’s reproductive rights would be challenged. There is no definitive definition of feminism, being fluid is a part of what makes it so powerful.
Because two programs occupied this Saturday, there was a divide between these two protests. With both events occurring at the same time this only furthers the stigma.
March for Life was protesting Roe V Wade but that did not make it any less progressive. There is power in forming a group to express belief. Women’s rights can still be advocated for as well as being pro- life. Women who are pro-life should not be discounted as anti-feminist.
When choosing who to march with this Saturday, getting our voices heard mattered most.
Just because we couldn’t march for both does not mean we cannot believe in both – feminism comes in all shapes and forms.
– Editorial Board