The University of Idaho Argonaut

Saturday
Mar 20th
  • Login
  • Sign up
    Registration
    Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
    Name: *
    Username: *
    E-mail: *
    Password: *
    Verify Password: *
  • Search
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home arrow Front Row arrow Furry Fun
Furry Fun Print E-mail
Written by Chava Thomas - Argonaut   
Monday, 30 November 2009

The word “furry” was first used in 1980 to describe a culture where individuals identify with anthropomorphic animals. Since then, it has become a far-reaching phenomenon, with commissioned artwork filling the Internet and fur suits, costumes similar to those seen for sports mascots, becoming a fixture at almost all fan conventions.

Anime fans, especially women, are known to wear animal ears and tails for the sake of cuteness. Not all people who wear animal accessories could be considered furries. Furries identify with animals, often to the point where they think of themselves as animals in a human body.

There are many different types of furries. Some people merely enjoy the artwork that results from those that identify as furries, and some enjoy dressing up as animals to further incorporate the animal identity. Although many furries distance themselves from the sexual aspect of furry fandom, it is deeply ingrained into the subculture.

A survey by the psychology department of the University of California-Davis showed that 2 percent of furries have interest in zoophilia, or the sexual love of animals, and less than 1 percent engage in plushophilia, or sexual contact with stuffed animals. Many more furries engage in “yiffing,” or interpersonal sexual activity with an animal theme.

Furries tend to get a bad rap. Many of them are innocent and merely like animals. Like any group of people, there are degenerates among their members, and there are furries who enjoy pedophilia and other socially unacceptable activities. Not all furries are sexual furries, but they often get lumped into the same category. As such, many furries feel persecuted by the media, which often portrays furries as sex-crazed perverts, as seen in TV shows like “CSI.”

The idea of people walking around in crotch-less fur suits at conventions populated by 13-year-old anime fans is unappealing. Hentai fans keep their animated pornography to late-night showings where security asks for identification at the door. Furries are entitled to their lifestyle, but this doesn’t mean they should be able to yiff in full view.
Add as favorites (24) | Views: 1237

Comments (3)
1. 01-12-2009 06:47
 
Pics Or It Didn't Happen
Except furries don't yiff in full view, despite what people watch on fictionalized TV shows like CSI. It's funny how some people can be so gullible. 
 
But I'm sure anime fans don't like the stereotype of being into artwork featuring underage girls being tentacle-raped, either. People in glass houses and all.
Registered
 
xydexx
2. 03-12-2009 18:04
 
You've Got To Be Kidding
You're article is entirely based on stereotypes. Consequently there's not a word of truth in it. 
 
The more the world gets to know who Furries actually are, the more lame these stereotyping articles look. Maybe for once somebody could actually research this topic before writing about it. 
 
That's a really nice trick you do with the survey, quoting figures like 1% and 2%, and then making out like those 1 or 2 percent are worth the rest of your article. Apparently you don't think anyone would be interested in knowing anything about the other 97% of the people your article stigmatizes. 
 
Your readers will be happy to know that rule of conduct and public display have been enforced at Furry cons for over 10 years. These crochless fursuits you refer to are not something the attendees of a fur con can expect to see in public areas, assuming they even exist. 
 
As for the tails and ears seen at Anime cons, they are very often made and sold by Furries. The two fandoms are siblings with a long shared history that goes back to the 70's. One is no better or worse than the other.
Registered
 
Perri_Rhoades
3. 14-12-2009 11:52
 
Dubious Article, or bad writer with good
I understand sir that you are trying your best to try and defend us (at least before the last paragraph), however, you are ill equipped. You're a journalist who has not yet learned how to play with words enough to provide a proper defense, and because of this, like a policeman without knowledge in firearms your shots of defense did more damage then good. Worse off not only did you damage the furries, you damaged your own reputation as a journalist. 
 
For one, let us look over something called "Weasel Words", no pun intended (ok maybe a little). They are very convenient words used by people who either want to make generalizations for nefarious reasons, or want to walk on eggshells as not to appear to make generalizations. However, my point is, one must use these with caution otherwise they will contradict themselves. 
 
For example: 
 
"Many more furries engage in “yiffing,” or interpersonal sexual activity with an animal theme." 
 
and  
 
"Many of them are innocent and merely like animals."  
 
So, you just said many furries are innocent, and many of them are sexually devious. A contradiction so clear that it doesn't take a Phoenix Wright to call out "Objection!"  
 
You claimed the media stereotypes furries, but inadvertently you just did to, at least CSI can see that it did, as shown in an article done in a Pittsburg Newpaper, don't think I haven't boxed their ears about that. I wrote an article after they admitted their wrong (http://sonious.livejournal.com/49868.html). 
 
But I must say, your last paragraph is just odd... it seems out of place as opposed to the rest of them. If that image is unappealing, then why bring it up? Was there an incident on campus like that or is that something you just heard and put it on there? It makes this piece seem reactionary, like there was something that happened that forced you to write about this. Why say they shouldn't be able to yiff in full view? Have they done this on campus? Isn't it common sense that people shouldn't expose themselves in public like that? Therefore are you saying furries don't have common sense? Are you getting annoyed at my Socratic method yet?  
 
The fact of the matter is, that sentence is probably more harmful then the stereotypes in CSI, at least they had furries doing that stuff in a room.  
 
I don't know whether you did this on purpose or not, and quite frankly I don't know if you had good intentions or nefarious ones. Quite frankly I think you're mistaking neutrality with attacking from both sides, these are not the same thing. In fact, it brings your writing into extreme question, for the reasons I have shown above. 
 
I hope you didn't get a good grade on this, if you did I wouldn't trust your professor as a good journalist. Your conclusion was a jump in transition and was completely different then the rest of your content. Your weasel words did not solidify your opinion and in fact demolished your credibility. Your contradictions about furries not being sex-crazed, and then not having the fortitude to keep it in their pants when in public shows you as being shaky as what you believe mainstream furry behavior is. 
 
I personally would give you at most a C. For grammar, punctuation, and the such (though I didn't see this prior to the editor touching it). As for actual content, you've got a lot to learn on how to form solid and persuasive opinions, and you do that by using facts and examples. The last thing we need in this world are more journalists and writers making a living by pulling things out of their hind end. 
 
I'm sorry if this offended you, however I am doing something you didn't do in your writing, taking a stance and sticking with it. I believe it would be more harmful to you personally if I were to let you continue to make these mistakes then to show you them in the rawest way I can.
Registered
 
Tantroo_McNally

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
Title:
Comment:

 
 
 
Moscow, ID
Increasing CloudsToday: Increasing Clouds
Hi 59°F
Lo 35°F
More...